Health Reform in Massachusetts: An Update as of Fall 2010
January 2012:
This report presents the latest findings from the Massachusetts Health Reform Survey (MHRS), which has been conducted since 2006 to monitor the impact of the Massachusetts health reform law.
This year's report shows that more than 90% of nonelderly adults have a usual source of care, up from 86% in 2006, and utilization of basic health services also increased. There is evidence that having unmet need for medical care is a problem, particularly for lower-income adults.
SHADAC Research Assistant Jessie Kemmick-Pintor and Lynn Blewett published an article in the October 2011 issue of Minnesota Physician as part of the journal’s special focus section on health reform. "Immigrant access to health care" reviews the key provisions of national legislation pertaining to access to care for immigrants.
Using insurance coverage among immigrants to address health care access issues, the authors find that across the U.S. and within Minnesota, non-citizens are four times more likely to be uninsured than their citizen counterparts.
Federal policies have hindered coverage among the immigrant population include. The authors foresee an increasing reliance on formal and informal safety nets to provide care for uninsured immigrants under the restrictions of the Affordable Care Act. At the same time, less political will and lower state and federal tax revenue is likely to be directed to the safety net.
Lynn Blewett and Elizabeth Lukanen participated in the final all-grantee meeting of the State Health Access Program (SHAP), held August 23-24, 2011, in Washington, DC. Lynn led a session on Health Reform and Provider Capacity.
Her presentation "Health Reform and Provider Capacity," focused on the importance of conducting provider capacity at a state level given the passage of health reform, key analytic steps to this type of analysis and alternative ways to monitor and assess provider capacity issues.
The importance of geographic data aggregation in assessing disparities in American Indian prenatal care.
Objectives. We sought to determine whether aggregate nationaldata for American Indians/Alaska Natives (AIANs) mask geographicvariation and substantial subnational disparities in prenatalcare utilization.
Methods. We used data for US births from 1995 to 1997 and from2000 to 2002 to examine prenatal care utilization among AIANand non-Hispanic White mothers. The indicators we studied werelate entry into prenatal care and inadequate utilization ofprenatal care. We calculated rates and disparities for eachindicator at the national, regional, and state levels, and weexamined whether estimates for regions and states differed significantlyfrom national estimates. We then estimated state-specific changesin prevalence rates and disparity rates over time.
Results. Prenatal care utilization varied by region and statefor AIANs and non-Hispanic Whites. In the 12 states with thelargest AIAN birth populations, disparities varied dramatically.In addition, some states demonstrated substantial reductionsin disparities over time, and other states showed significantincreases in disparities.
Conclusions. Substantive conclusions about AIAN health caredisparities should be geographically specific, and conclusionsdrawn at the national level may be unsuitable for policymakingand intervention at state and local levels. Efforts to accommodatethe geographically specific data needs of AIAN health researchersand others interested in state-level comparisons are warranted.